In September 2022, The Epoch Instances requested the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention to launch its Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) information mining outcomes. PRR1 measures how frequent an opposed occasion is for a selected drug in comparison with all the opposite medicine within the database.

Based on the usual working procedures2,3 for the Vaccine Adversarial Occasion Reporting System (VAERS), which is run collectively by the CDC and the Meals and Drug Administration, the CDC is required to carry out these information mining analyses.

Not solely did the CDC refuse to launch the info, however it additionally supplied false data — twice — in response to The Epoch Instances’ questions in regards to the monitoring being carried out. As reported by The Epoch Instances again in September 2022,4 the CDC initially claimed PRR analyses have been “exterior the company’s purview” and that no monitoring was being achieved by them.

Ultimately, the company admitted it was doing PRRs, beginning in February 2021, solely to later declare they did not carry out any PRRs till March 2022. The Epoch Instances additionally cited a number of papers by which the FDA and/or CDC claimed their information mining efforts had come up empty handed.5 Now, we discover that was all a pack of lies.

CDC Monitoring Reveals A whole bunch of Security Alerts

In actuality, the CDC’s PRR monitoring reveals HUNDREDS of security indicators, together with Bell’s palsy, blood clots, pulmonary embolism and demise — all of which, in accordance with the foundations, require thorough investigation to both verify or rule out a doable hyperlink to the pictures. As reported by The Epoch Instances in early January 2023:6

“The CDC evaluation was carried out on opposed occasions reported from Dec. 14, 2020, to July 29, 2022. The Epoch Instances obtained the outcomes via a Freedom of Info Act request after the CDC refused to make the outcomes public …

PRR entails evaluating the incidence of a selected opposed occasion after a selected vaccine to the incidence in any case different vaccines. A sign is triggered when three thresholds are met, in accordance with the CDC: a PRR of not less than 2, a chi-squared statistic of not less than 4, and three or extra instances of the occasion following receipt of the vaccine being analyzed. Chi-squared checks are a type of statistical evaluation used to look at information.

The outcomes obtained by The Epoch Instances present that there are a whole bunch of opposed occasions (AEs) that meet the definition, together with severe situations corresponding to blood clotting within the lungs, intermenstrual bleeding, a scarcity of oxygen to the center, and even demise. The excessive numbers, notably the chi-squared figures, involved consultants.

For lots of the occasions, ‘the chi-squared is so excessive that, from a Bayesian perspective, the chance that the true charge of the AE of the COVID vaccines just isn’t larger than that of the non-COVID vaccines is basically zero,’ Norman Fenton, a professor of danger administration at Queen Mary College of London, advised The Epoch Instances in an e-mail after operating the numbers via a Bayesian mannequin that gives possibilities primarily based on obtainable data.”

Myopericarditis Is Far From the Solely Downside

One of many few unwanted effects of the COVID jabs that the CDC has really acknowledged is myocarditis (coronary heart irritation), and a associated situation known as pericarditis (irritation of the center sack). Alas, the PRR monitoring outcomes reveal there are greater than 500 different opposed occasions which have stronger warning indicators than both of these situations.

Josh Guetzkow, an Israeli professor skilled in statistics at Princeton College advised The Epoch Instances:7

“We all know that the sign for myocarditis is related to one thing that’s attributable to the mRNA vaccines, so it is greater than cheap to say that something with a sign bigger than myocarditis/pericarditis must be taken significantly and investigated.”

Guetzkow expanded on his commentary in a January 4, 2023, Substack article.8 Under is a abstract record of a number of the key findings from the CDC’s PRR evaluation. Guetzkow goes deeper in his article, so for extra particulars, I recommend studying it in its entirety.

For much more analyses and commentary, see Fenton’s Substack article, “The CDC’s Information on COVID Vaccine Security Alerts.”9 If you wish to examine the PRR information for your self, you’ll be able to obtain them from The Epoch Instances’ January 3, 2023, article.10 You may also discover them here.11

In people aged 18 and older, there are security indicators for 770 completely different opposed occasions, and two-thirds of them (greater than 500) have a stronger security sign than myocarditis and pericarditis. Of these 770 indicators, 12 are brand-new situations that haven’t been reported following different vaccines.

Topping the record of security indicators are cardiovascular situations, adopted by neurological situations. In third and fourth place are thromboembolic situations and pulmonary situations. Dying is sixth on the record and most cancers is eleventh. Contemplating the uptick we have seen in aggressive cancers, the truth that demise tops most cancers actually says one thing.

The variety of severe opposed occasions reported between mid-December 2020 and the top of July 2022 (simply over 19 months) for the COVID jabs is 5.5 instances better than all severe stories for vaccines given to adults within the U.S. over the past 13 years (roughly 73,000 versus 13,000).

Twice as many COVID jab stories have been categorized as severe in comparison with all different vaccines given to adults (11% vs. 5.5%), which meets the definition of a security sign.

The proportions of reported deaths, which was solely supplied for the 18+ age group, was 14% for the COVID jabs in comparison with 4.7% for all different vaccines. As famous by Fenton,12 “If the CDC want [sic] to say that the chance a COVID vaccine opposed occasion ends in demise just isn’t considerably larger than that of different vaccines the onus is on them to give you another causal clarification for this distinction.”

Within the 12- to 17-year-old age group, there are 96 security indicators, together with myocarditis, pericarditis, Bell’s Palsy, genital ulcerations, hypertension, menstrual irregularities, cardiac valve incompetency, pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrhythmia, thrombosis, pericardial and pleural effusion, appendicitis and perforated appendix, immune thrombocytopenia, chest ache and elevated troponin ranges (indicative of coronary heart injury).

Within the 5- to 11-year-old group, there are 66 security indicators, together with myocarditis, pericarditis, ventricular dysfunction, cardiac valve incompetency, pericardial and pleural effusion, chest ache, appendicitis and appendectomies, Kawasaki’s illness, menstrual irregularities and vitiligo.

It is price noting that the CDC did not carry out its first security sign evaluation till March 25, 2022 — 15 months after the pictures have been rolled out. Why the lengthy wait — particularly for the reason that CDC had introduced it could start monitoring in early 2021? Simply contemplate, for a second, what number of lives have been misplaced as a result of the CDC didn’t correctly monitor security, and nonetheless drags its ft relating to warning individuals in regards to the dangers concerned.

FDA Nonetheless Refuses to Share Security Information

The FDA can be required to carry out security monitoring utilizing one other method known as Empirical Bayesian information mining. The Epoch Instances first requested the FDA to launch its monitoring outcomes again in July 2022,13,14 however just like the CDC, the FDA refused and insisted the info confirmed no proof of significant opposed results. In different phrases, “Simply belief us. We’re consultants.”

Based on the FDA, the one potential sign they’d discovered via April 16, 2021, was for raised physique temperature.15 Then, in mid-December 2022 — simply 4 months after The Epoch Instances tried to get these information — the FDA introduced that pulmonary embolism (blood clots that block blood move within the lungs) had met the brink for a statistical sign, and continued to fulfill the factors after in-depth analysis, however it was solely linked to the Pfizer jab.16

As famous by The Epoch Instances,17 pulmonary embolism can be recognized as a sign within the CDC’s PRR evaluation for people as younger as 12, which actually should strengthen issues.

The FDA additionally admitted it had already evaluated three different warning indicators: lack of oxygen to the center, immune thrombocytopenia (a blood platelet dysfunction) and intravascular coagulation (a kind of blood clotting), however none of those continued to fulfill the brink after evaluation.

If the FDA was evaluating 4 warning indicators, why did they inform The Epoch Instances there was no proof of in poor health results, and why did they declare the one potential sign they’d discovered was slight fever? Are we to consider they found these indicators after The Epoch Instances requested for the monitoring outcomes after which accomplished 4 in-depth investigations in 4 months?

Regardless of the fact, it is clear that each the CDC and FDA usually are not being clear. Worse, they’ve hidden information, figuring out it might imply the distinction between life and demise for a whole bunch of hundreds of individuals.

CDC Has Ignored Clear ‘Dying’ Sign

The CDC ignoring a transparent sign for demise might be probably the most egregious instance of its failures as a public well being establishment. As early as July 2021, Matthew Crawford revealed a three-part collection18,19,20 detailing how the CDC was hiding security indicators through the use of a flawed method. In August that 12 months, Steve Kirsch knowledgeable the company of those issues, however was ignored.

Then, in an October 3, 2022, article,21 Kirsch went on to indicate how “demise” ought to have triggered a sign even when utilizing the CDC’s flawed method (which is described in its VAERS customary working procedures handbook22). Here is an excerpt:23

“The method the CDC makes use of for producing security indicators is essentially flawed; a ‘dangerous’ vaccine with plenty of opposed occasions will ‘masks’ massive numbers of vital security indicators … Let me summarize the important thing factors for you in a nutshell: PRR [proportional reporting ratio] is outlined on web page 16 within the CDC doc24 as follows …

A ‘security sign’ is outlined on web page 16 within the CDC doc as a PRR of not less than 2, chi-squared statistic of not less than 4, and three or extra instances of the AE [adverse event] following receipt of the particular vaccine of curiosity. That is the well-known ‘and clause.’ Right here it’s from the doc:

proportional reporting ratio

Solely somebody who’s incompetent or is intentionally attempting to make the vaccines look secure would use the phrase ‘and’ within the definition of a security sign.

Utilizing ‘and’ implies that if any one of many situations is not happy, no security sign will probably be generated. As famous beneath, the PRR will hardly ever set off which nearly ensures that the majority occasions generated by an unsafe vaccine won’t ever get flagged.

The PRR worth for the COVID vaccines will hardly ever exceed 1 as a result of there are such a lot of opposed occasions from the COVID vaccine as a result of it’s so harmful (i.e., B within the method is a big quantity) so the numerator is all the time close to zero. Therefore, the ‘security sign’ is never triggered as a result of the vaccine is so harmful.”

A Fictitious Instance

Utilizing a fictitious vaccine as the instance, Kirsch defined how an exceptionally harmful vaccine will fly underneath the radar and never get flagged, due to this flawed method:25

“Suppose we have now the world’s most harmful vaccine that causes opposed occasions in everybody who will get it and generates 25,000 completely different opposed occasions, and every opposed occasion has 1,000 cases.

That implies that the numerator is 1,000/25,000,000 which is simply 40 occasions per million reported occasions. Now let’s take a look at actuals for one thing like deaths. For all different vaccines, there are 6,200 deaths and 1 million opposed occasions whole.

Since 40 per million is lower than 6,200 deaths per million, we’re not even near producing a security sign for deaths from our hypothetical vaccine which killed 1,000 individuals in a 12 months … The purpose is {that a} harmful vaccine can look very ‘secure’ utilizing the PRR method.”

Calculating Dying Sign for the COVID Jab

Subsequent, Kirsch calculates the PRR for demise for the COVID jab — utilizing VAERS information and the CDC’s definitions and method. As of December 31, 2019, there have been 6,157 deaths and 918,717 opposed occasions whole for all vaccines apart from the COVID shot. As of September 23, 2022, there have been 31,214 deaths and 1.4 million opposed occasions whole for the COVID jabs. Here is the method as defined by Kirsch:26

“PRR = (31,214/1.4e6) / (6,157/918,717) = 3.32, which exceeds the required threshold of two. In different phrases, the COVID vaccine is so lethal that even with all of the opposed occasions generated by the vaccine, the demise sign didn’t get drowned out!

However there may be nonetheless the chi-square take a look at. Chi-square take a look at outcomes have been 18,549 for ‘demise,’ which tremendously exceeds the required threshold of 4. The CDC chi-square take a look at is clearly happy for the COVID vaccine. As a result of the demise sign is so enormous, it even survived the PRR take a look at.

Which means that even utilizing the CDCs personal misguided … method, all three standards have been happy:

1. PRR>2 [PRR greater than 2]: It was 3.32

2. Chi-square>2 [Chi-square greater than 2]: It was 18,549

3. 3 or extra stories: There have been over 31,214 demise stories acquired by VAERS … which is greater than 3

A security sign ought to have been generated however wasn’t. Why not? … A whole bunch of hundreds of American lives have been misplaced as a result of lack of ability of the CDC to deploy their very own flawed security sign evaluation … It has been identified since not less than 2004 that utilizing reporting odds ratio (ROR) is a greater estimate of relative danger than PRR.27 I do not know why the CDC would not use it.”

The CDC can be hiding the severity of unwanted effects in different methods. As defined by Fenton,28 the best way unwanted effects are categorized by the CDC assist obfuscate the size of sure issues. For instance, “cardiac failure acute,” “cardiac failure,” “infarction,” “myocardial pressure” and “myocardial fibrosis” are listed as separate classes, regardless that in actual life they’re all potential results of myocarditis.

By separating them, you find yourself with fewer frequency counts per class, thereby providing you with an underpowered chi-square take a look at so {that a} warning sign just isn’t triggered. If associated classes have been merged, far stronger security indicators would seemingly emerge.

CDC Has No Affordable Protection

The CDC is liable for monitoring each VAERS and V-Secure, and between these two databases, there is no doable means they might ever say they did not know the pictures have been harming and killing thousands and thousands of Individuals.

The CDC additionally has entry to different databases, together with the Protection Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), which (earlier than it was deliberately altered29) confirmed huge will increase in debilitating and deadly situations, together with a tripling of most cancers instances.30

The findings in these databases have by no means been introduced ahead throughout any of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) conferences or the FDA’s Vaccines and Associated Organic Merchandise Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) conferences, at which members have repeatedly voted to authorize the jabs to individuals of all ages, together with infants and pregnant ladies.

They even added these poisonous pictures to the childhood vaccine schedule — which permits states to mandate them for varsity attendance — with out addressing any of the 66 security indicators discovered within the CDC’s PRR evaluation. The very fact of the matter is that the CDC has identified about these dangers all alongside, and there is no excuse for not sharing and performing on these information.

Assist Unfold the Phrase

Mainstream media are ignoring all of this, so assist unfold the phrase. Everybody must know what the CDC’s security information reveal. To that finish, listed below are a couple of ideas for how one can assist:

  • Write or name your members of Congress and ask them to research the CDC’s security monitoring — We can not have a public security company that’s incapable of monitoring security and taking applicable motion when issues are discovered, be it correcting a flawed method or saying {that a} security sign has been detected. After all, they need to additionally publish their findings as soon as an investigation has been made.
  • Contact your native newspaper and urge them to research and report on the CDC’s failure to behave on security indicators.
  • Share the info on social media and ask why nobody within the media, Congress, academia or medical neighborhood is investigating these issues.
  • Share this data along with your physician and members of the medical neighborhood.
  • Additionally share it with college directors, and ask them to clarify how and why, in gentle of those information, they’re nonetheless mandating COVID pictures.