Ayesha Rascoe speaks with Dr. Frank Lin of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Faculty of Public Well being concerning the hyperlink between listening to loss and dementia, and the way over-the-counter listening to aids might assist.


Over-the-counter listening to aids – no prescription needed – could possibly be at a retailer close to you this fall. That is as a result of the Meals and Drug Administration determined final week to create a class of OTC gadgets for adults with delicate to average listening to loss. It is anticipated to drive down the price – excellent news for tens of millions of People who want the gadgets however cannot afford them. And it is not simply the flexibility to listen to that is necessary. Dr. Frank Lin has been researching the consequences and dangers of listening to loss for years. He is the director of the Cochlear Middle for Listening to and Public Well being at Johns Hopkins in Baltimore, and he joins us now. Welcome.

FRANK LIN: Thanks a lot, Ayesha.

RASCOE: So first, do you will have any thought what number of People with listening to loss even have listening to aids?

LIN: It is roughly about 15 to twenty% of People with listening to loss really report utilizing a listening to assist. It is phenomenally low, and it actually hasn’t modified in lots of, a few years.

RASCOE: Medicare does not cowl the price, which may common about $4,700 for a pair of listening to aids. And most insurance policy do not cowl it, both. I might suppose that that may be a barrier for some folks – that amount of cash.

LIN: Forty-seven hundred {dollars} – to place that in perspective – for the typical American, that could possibly be your third-largest materials buy in life after a home and a automobile. However I am going to say, in the identical breath, although, it is not solely value – problems with entry, the one solution to get a listening to assist per se now could be to make a number of journeys to see an audiologist or an ENT like me and, , a number of journeys thereafter to get match and adjusted. After which past that, there’s points the place folks do not suppose listening to is necessary. They suppose it is only a – , it is a common strategy of growing old, and therefore, it is inconsequential. And there are points with clearly simply the expertise themselves. Why – in the event you spend a lot cash on a listening to assist, why does not it work seamlessly with my – for example my cellphone and my pc and my TV, as an example? However unquestionably, value is – and entry are most likely the largest points.

RASCOE: So that you and your colleagues have studied different well being dangers related to listening to loss. What has your analysis discovered?

LIN: A few decade in the past, we started a collection of analysis research. And we more and more discovered that listening to loss was strongly linked together with your danger of dementia. And to this present day now, primarily based on all of the research over the past 10 years displaying that listening to loss is arguably the one largest doubtlessly treatable or doubtlessly modifiable danger issue for dementia.

RASCOE: Do we’ve any sense of why that could be the case? As a result of some folks could also be listening and be like, effectively, what does listening to must do with dementia?

LIN: (Laughter). You understand, you are completely proper. I imply, like, , listening to loss impacts, like, the inside ear – your cochlea. And dementia is about your mind. How may they be associated? Nevertheless it comes right down to most likely arguably three main mechanisms. So the primary mechanism is mainly that listening to loss probably imposes a load on the mind. And what I imply by that’s when you may’t hear effectively, when you will have had some growing old of your inside ear, it mainly means your mind’s continuously getting a way more garbled sound out of your ear. And in flip, what the mind has to do to consciously decode that sound is the mind has to kind of throw extra brainpower at it. And when the mind has to try this, these mind sources might come on the expense of different programs, like our pondering and reminiscence talents.

The second thought is expounded however really could be very totally different. And it is the concept that listening to loss really does immediately impacts the mind’s structural integrity. Elements of the mind which are used to receiving sound start to atrophy sooner. And we really see this no longer solely in animal research however in human research. And at last, the third thought – and once more, the factor I would like to emphasise is these concepts aren’t mutually unique – not that one’s proper; different ones are unsuitable. It is probably a mixture of all three. The final ones probably the most intuitive. And it is the concept that, , for some folks, if you cannot hear very effectively, you could be extra remoted and therefore lonely. And in flip, for a lot of, a few years now, we have understood that social isolation and loneliness probably immediately impacts our danger of cognitive decline dementia, primarily by means of lack of cognitively stimulating actions but additionally only a lack of engagement with the world round us as we develop into kind of extra pigeonholed at house generally.

RASCOE: Will the over-the counter gadgets – will they be ok to really handle People’, like, listening to loss points?

LIN: Completely. And I have been engaged on the over-the-counter listening to assist laws laws actually for eight years. And the laws, thankfully, are such that they will profit folks as much as a average listening to loss, which mainly means amongst American adults with listening to loss, totally about 90% of individuals, if not a bit extra, could possibly be served by OTC listening to aids by way of the sound output ranges, which simply makes it extremely thrilling as a result of unexpectedly, in a single fell swoop, you are going to see innovation. You are going to see competitors. You are going to see elevated entry. And you are going to see decrease prices. So it is actually a win, win win throughout.

RASCOE: Are there any considerations about shopping for listening to aids on the retailer the way in which somebody would possibly get some studying glasses? Is there any danger to this?

LIN: Sure, and also you’re speaking to a surgeon right here. So the whole lot from a surgeon’s viewpoint is, , profit versus danger. So are there dangers, , danger of somebody underamplifying their listening to loss or overamplifying their listening to loss or possibly lacking, like, some sort of bizarre listening to situation? Sure, that is all the time theoretically a danger. The query is, is it outweighed a number of orders of magnitude by the advantages? And, , I feel the perfect line about all of this comes from Stephanie Czuhajewski, who’s my good friend and colleague. She stated, , the one means an over-the-counter listening to assist goes to kill you is in the event you swallow it. And I feel it is completely true. It is only a listening to assist. It is not going to kill you.

RASCOE: That is Dr. Frank Lin, director of the Cochlear Middle for Listening to and Public Well being on the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Faculty of Public Well being. Thanks for speaking with us right now.

LIN: Completely. Thanks a lot, Ayesha.

Copyright © 2022 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional data.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This textual content is probably not in its last kind and could also be up to date or revised sooner or later. Accuracy and availability might fluctuate. The authoritative report of NPR’s programming is the audio report.