Recent diet trends have promised that clocks are as necessary for weight reduction as scales. One such weight-reduction plan is named intermittent fasting, which entails a schedule of alternating fasting and consuming. A preferred intermittent fasting schedule is time-restricted consuming. By proscribing consuming to a restricted variety of hours a day, some proponents of this weight-reduction plan argue folks can harness their our bodies’ pure rhythms to shed kilos.

However in response to new analysis, most recently a study published within the Journal of the American Coronary heart Affiliation on Jan. 18, the time while you eat, in and of itself, doesn’t look like useful for weight reduction.

Within the research, 547 members used a telephone software to trace their day by day meals over a six-month interval, which the researchers used to find out, on common, what occasions every individual ate day-after-day; what number of meals they ate; whether or not the members described every meal as small, medium, or massive; and the way a lot weight they gained or misplaced. In the end, they discovered that the time between members’ first and final meal, and once they ate relative to the time they wakened or went to sleep didn’t influence weight. What did matter was the size of the participants’ meals: individuals who ate extra large- or medium-sized meals have been extra prone to achieve weight, whereas individuals who ate small meals have been extra prone to drop some weight.

Research co-author Dr. Wendy Bennett, a main care physician and affiliate professor at Johns Hopkins Faculty of Medication, emphasised that this isn’t the ultimate phrase on meal timing, partly as a result of it’s an observational research—which means the researchers didn’t management the situations whereas they have been taking place, such because the energy they consumed. Krista Varady, a vitamin researcher who research intermittent fasting on the College of Illinois, Chicago, who didn’t take part within the research says that there are a number of elements that will cloud the outcomes, together with the small pattern measurement, its reliance on members describing the dimensions of their meals as massive or small—and never log particular calorie counts—and the usage of totally different scales to weigh the members at docs’ places of work.

Nonetheless, Varady agrees that there doesn’t appear to be any magic to consuming at a sure time. However that doesn’t imply it’s a wholly ineffective idea. Proscribing consuming to sure occasions may also help folks to drop some weight, Varady says, as long as it causes you to eat less. And for some, she notes, it may be simpler to stay to than different diets that require you to depend energy. For instance, she says, earlier analysis reveals that it may possibly assist for those who solely eat inside a six-to-eight hour window—say, 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. (six hours) or 9 a.m. to five p.m. (eight hours).

Dr. Nisa Maruthur, an affiliate professor at Johns Hopkins Faculty of Medication, agrees. “In case your energy are the identical, no matter while you eat them, there’s not an influence on weight,” says Maruthur. Nonetheless, establishing temporal boundaries may also help. “In case you resolve you’re solely consuming between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m., the actual fact is that you could be eat fewer energy, simply since you solely match [in] so many [meals] in that point.” Maruthur, who didn’t take part on this explicit research, however is concerned in a broader initiative at Johns Hopkins to look at meal timing, says that whereas consuming at a specific time isn’t useful, she’d nonetheless suggest timed consuming if it helps a specific individual eat extra healthfully. “The very best weight-reduction plan for anybody might be the weight-reduction plan that they will observe,” she says. “If some folks discover it simpler to eat more healthy meals as a result of they’re planning a bit extra,” she says, time restricted consuming might be useful.

Extra Should-Reads From TIME


Contact us at letters@time.com.